Interoperability could save US healthcare $77.8B a year, and the technology to do it has been live for months

by admin@pulsecheck.news | Aug 22, 2026

TEFCA is operational, information-blocking rules have teeth, and hundreds of billions in savings are sitting on the table anyway.

The infrastructure to fix healthcare's data fragmentation problem now technically exists. The savings it's supposed to unlock mostly haven't shown up yet, and that gap is where the next wave of interoperability startups is placing its bets.

The technology is live, the savings are still theoretical

The Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement, TEFCA, has exchanged nearly 500 million records as of early 2026, according to Keragon's interoperability vendor analysis. Full interoperability could save the US healthcare system $77.8B annually by reducing administrative costs, duplicate testing, and medical errors, per the same analysis, while a JAMA study found administrative complexity already accounts for $265.6B in annual waste, much of it from manual data re-entry, faxed records, and phone-based referrals that interoperable systems are specifically built to eliminate.

Physicians currently spend an average of 16 minutes per patient encounter searching for external health records, time that better interoperability could cut to just 3-4 minutes, according to the same research, freeing meaningfully more time for actual patient care rather than data hunting.

35% of Canadian physicians using EMRs report spending two or more extra hours a day searching for patient information, a data point from an adjacent healthcare system showing the problem TEFCA and its US-based peers are trying to solve isn't unique to any one country's infrastructure.

Live infrastructure and realized savings are two different milestones

TEFCA being operational is a genuine milestone, but it's an infrastructure milestone, not an outcomes one. The $77.8B in potential annual savings depends on health systems, EHR vendors, and point-solution startups actually building on top of that infrastructure and changing clinical workflows accordingly, not just on the network existing. That gap between infrastructure being live and savings being realized is exactly the space companies like Metriport, Redox, and Datavant are trying to occupy, translating raw interoperability into an actual workflow change a clinician or care team notices.

Whether realized savings start showing up in health system financials

Watch for the first health systems to publicly report measurable reductions in administrative cost or duplicate testing directly attributable to TEFCA-based data exchange, rather than interoperability adoption metrics alone. The startups that can point to a real health system's before-and-after cost data, not just network participation numbers, are the ones most likely to convert this infrastructure milestone into an actual enterprise sales advantage over the next funding cycle.

Share this article

About Pulse Check

Pulse Check is a monthly read on what's actually moving across the healthcare startup ecosystem, funding, technology, care delivery, and the categories reshaping how startups compete, without the noise. Every edition is built for founders and operators who don't have time to scan twenty different sources themselves. We track the deals, the industry signal, and the category trends that change what a fundable pitch, a defensible product, or a smart move looks like this month. No filler, no hype, just what matters and why.

Subscribe to Pulse Check to receive monthly updates direct to your inbox.

Pulse Check is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical, financial, legal, or investment advice. Nothing in this publication should be relied upon as a substitute for professional advice from a qualified provider, advisor, or practitioner. Collective Loop makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, or currency of any information, data, or figures referenced, and readers should independently verify anything material to their own decisions.

All company names, logos, trademarks, product screenshots, and website imagery referenced or displayed in this publication remain the property of their respective owners. Their inclusion is for editorial and informational purposes only and does not imply endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation between Collective Loop and the companies featured, unless explicitly stated.